Hawk: Rpeak
TOP500 and HLRS disagree; the recorded figure is left unchanged until one is confirmed.
Open questions
Most datasets pick a winner and move on. When two credible sources give different figures for the same fact, we record both, leave the row unchanged or blank, and list the conflict here with both links. Each one is a place where a reader with the right knowledge, or an operator with a corrected page, could settle it.
51 open. A conflict leaves this list only when a source settles it, never because we prefer one side.
TOP500 and HLRS disagree; the recorded figure is left unchanged until one is confirmed.
The recorded figure equals 5,632 nodes times 128 cores; no fetched page states the node count.
EuroHPC quotes a higher figure that may be a combined or later result; TOP500 is used.
Both pages are TACC; neither figure is recorded.
The later page is treated as current, but no date is recorded.
CEA's own October 2025 slides give the larger figure; the 477 is kept.
It is unclear whether either is facility or IT load, so power is left blank.
TOP500's figure is used.
Possibly a benchmark image versus production; no OS edge is recorded.
Crusoe's wording is ambiguous between racks and GPUs and the estimate names different parts, so no count is recorded.
No interconnect edge is recorded until one source resolves it.
Probably different scopes: the announced system versus the run TOP500 measured.
TOP500's figure is used.
The lower figure is the pre-installation plan; TOP500's measured peak is used.
No capacity is recorded.
Both pages are TACC; no Intel GPU count is recorded.
The press release may describe the target and the docs the state at the time.
The 382 looks like a transposition; 328 matches 82 nodes of four.
TOP500 may be stale; no OS edge is recorded.
No OS edge is recorded.
A third source gives 588; no peak is recorded.
No cooling edge is recorded.
JSC includes later additions; TOP500 is used.
TOP500's figure is used.
Only the month is recorded.
Meta and NVIDIA describe the same fabric at different speeds, so no speed is recorded and no fabric part edge is added.
QCT also gives 2.7. No peak is recorded.
The iTnews figure may be a transposition. No core count is recorded.
No first-operational date is recorded.
Likely different scopes; no peak is recorded.
No core count is recorded.
TOP500 may be stale; no OS edge is recorded.
No peak is recorded.
No core count is recorded.
TOP500 may describe a subset of nodes; neither is recorded.
Both pages are CEA; no interconnect edge is recorded.
No core count is recorded.
No core count is recorded.
No CPU edge is recorded.
The two may measure different things; no figure is recorded.
The TOP500 entry alone exceeds LNCC total; no peak is recorded.
A later Globus post says Comet was retired by August 2021; only the year is recorded.
The award grew through supplements; no figure is recorded.
No source fetched for this pass reconciles the two; first_operational_date is left blank.
CHPC/CSIR and TOP500 give different total storage figures for the same 2016 build; no capacity is recorded in system_components.
NVIDIA's own release and TOP500's measured Rpeak disagree on the machine's double-precision peak; TOP500's figure is recorded as Rpeak.
The figure announced at Serafin's 2021 inauguration is about 6% higher than CCAD's own current technical page states for the deployed 60-node configuration; no Rpeak is recorded in the systems table.
TOP500's figure is used; AGH's 6,144 appears to count only the AMD EPYC CPU cores, not whatever TOP500 aggregates into its own core count.
The portal total looks like it includes a few service or login nodes outside TOP500's ranked HPL partition of 76,320 cores; no single figure is recorded as verified.
TOP500's core count is used in the systems table; the press figure may be counting sockets rather than cores, or describing a slightly different point in the machine's history.
Both describe the same 44MW Bruyeres-le-Chatel facility but disagree on GPU generation and count; only NVIDIA's more recent figure is recorded on the system row.