21 numbers computed from the 1153 systems in the dataset. Each has a sentence you can paste, the method behind it,
and a link to the pages it comes from. They are recomputed on every build, so they stay true as systems are added. Each also has its own
page with a share card, and the whole set is at /facts.json.
Say what these are. Every figure describes the systems in this dataset, a curated sample, not the whole market. The quote
sentences say "in our dataset" for that reason; please keep those words when you share. Data as of 2026-10-09.
Speed
15,330,544x
faster in 33 years
The fastest measured system in our dataset is 15,330,544 times faster than the fastest we hold from 1993: 2.20 EFlop/s for LineShine against 143.4 GFlop/s.
Largest measured Rmax among systems first operational in 1993 (CM-5/1024, Numerical Wind Tunnel, Intel Paragon XP/S 140, UTokyo HITAC S-3800/480) against the largest measured Rmax in the dataset (LineShine, 2026). Measured means a LINPACK result, not a vendor peak.
Speed
41.9M
cores in the largest system
Sunway OceanLight has 41,930,000 cores. The smallest ranked system we track, UTokyo HITAC S-3800/480, has 4.
Core counts as reported on each system row; accelerator cores are included where the source counts them, so figures are comparable within a source and not always across.
Speed
68% vs 79%
share of peak reached, GPU vs CPU-only
On the LINPACK benchmark the median accelerated system in our dataset reaches 68% of its theoretical peak. The median CPU-only system reaches 79%.
Median of Rmax divided by Rpeak, both on the same row, across 359 accelerated and 363 CPU-only systems with a measured result. A system counts as accelerated if it has an accelerator component edge.
Speed
22
systems here reached #1 on the TOP500
22 of the 1153 systems in our dataset reached number one on the TOP500 at some point: CM-5/1024, ASCI Red, Earth Simulator, BlueGene/L, Roadrunner, Jaguar and more.
Systems whose stored TOP500 pointer is rank 1. We store one pointer per system, on the edition where it ranked highest, so a system that held #1 shows once. Rank is a link-out pointer, not a copy of the list.
Speed
94% to 387%
unranked AI clusters vs every ranked system here
Clusters that appear on no ranking anywhere add up to an estimated 94% to 387% of the combined LINPACK performance of every ranked system in our dataset. It is an estimate, bracketed by measured rates on the same chips.
The anchor-bracket-v1 estimator over 161 unranked systems that disclose an accelerator count, against the summed Rmax of 722 ranked systems. No vendor peak is multiplied by an assumed efficiency.
Power
100.00 MW
drawn by Cerebras Guyana AI Data Center
Cerebras Guyana AI Data Center draws 100.00 MW, the most of any of the 439 systems in our dataset that disclose a power figure.
Largest powerKw on a system row, among the 439 rows that state one. Power is as reported by the operator or the ranking; the boundary it measures (compute only, or whole facility) varies by source.
Power
97.5x
more LINPACK per megawatt
The median system that came online in 2020 or later delivers 97.5 times the LINPACK performance per megawatt of the median system from before 2012 (26.2 against 0.3 PFlop/s per MW), across our dataset.
Rmax divided by power in MW for systems with a measured result and a stated power figure: the median of 152 systems first operational in 2020 or later against 51 first operational before 2012.
Power
68.3
PFlop/s per MW, the best in the dataset
Otus is the most power-efficient system in our dataset on LINPACK: 68.3 PFlop/s for every megawatt.
Running systems (operational or upgraded) with a cooling component edge, classified as liquid or immersion against air or other. 768 running systems have no cooling edge recorded and are left out of the denominator, so this describes systems whose cooling is documented, which skews toward newer machines.
Power
44.80 MW
at National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen
National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen has the highest combined power draw of any site we track: 44.80 MW across its running systems.
Sum of Rmax over running systems, grouped by country. Our dataset is curated, not a census, and some countries' largest machines do not submit results, so treat this as the share of what is publicly measured in our sample.
Geography
1153
systems in 73 countries
Compute Atlas tracks 1153 supercomputers across 73 countries, each with a named source and a stated confidence level.
Systems with an accelerator component edge whose supplier rolls up to NVIDIA today, over all systems with any accelerator edge, across all years and statuses.
Supply chain
54% / 38%
of running accelerated Rmax, NVIDIA / AMD
Of the LINPACK performance running on accelerators in our dataset, 54% is on NVIDIA and 38% on AMD.
Rmax summed over running systems with an accelerator edge, split by the accelerator's owner today. A system with both vendors would count in both, so the two can total slightly over 100%.
Supply chain
13%
of supplier links point to a company since acquired
13% of the supplier relationships in our dataset (536 of 4258) are with a company that has since been bought.
Component edges whose supplier has a parent company recorded in companies.csv, over all component edges. The parent is the owner today; the supplier named is the one at build time.
Supply chain
26%
of systems were built by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Hewlett Packard Enterprise, counting the companies it has acquired, built 261 of the 1003 systems in our dataset with a recorded integrator (26%). The next, Dell Technologies, built 108.
Systems with an integrator component edge, grouped by the integrator's owner today, so Cray and SGI count toward HPE. Systems with no integrator recorded are excluded.
Supply chain
62%
of systems contain a NVIDIA part
NVIDIA supplies at least one component to 715 of the 1153 systems in our dataset (62%), more than any other company.
Distinct systems with at least one component edge whose supplier rolls up to the company today, in any role.
Timing
7 months
median from announcement to first operation
The median supercomputer in our dataset took 7 months from announcement to first operation. The fastest, Albert2, took under a month. The slowest, Aurora, took 107.
Whole years between first operation and decommissioning, over 117 decommissioned systems that record both. Systems still running are excluded, which biases this figure low.
Data quality
20%
of systems are verified by two independent sources
Only 20% of the systems in our dataset (234 of 1153) clear our verified bar: two independent organisations naming the same specific fact. The rest are marked reported or estimated.
Count of systems with confidence = verified. Verified requires two independent organisations; a page that copies a press release is not independent.
Data quality
51
open conflicts between sources
Across 41 systems, we have logged 51 facts where two credible sources give different answers, with both sides linked. We leave the field blank rather than pick one.
Open rows on the open-questions board. Each has two sources that disagree on one specific field.
Found a number that looks wrong? Every fact links to the rows it is built from, and the
open-questions board lists where our own sources disagree.
This site uses Google Analytics to see which pages get read. If you accept, it may set
cookies to recognise repeat visits. If you reject, no cookies are set, but an anonymous page-load
count is still sent. See how we use it.