Supercomputers/Systems/TX-GAIN
USA · operational · ai training
TX-GAIN
Also known as TX-Generative AI Next; LLSC TX-GAIN
Operated by MIT Lincoln Laboratory at MIT LLSC Holyoke .
Phase 1 seed dataset, compiled by hand. These rows were built from public operator, laboratory and vendor sources. A mechanical second-reader pass has since fetched every cited source: 1092 of 1153 systems have a readable citation that names them, and 40 are genuinely weakly sourced. Every claim carries its source and a confidence tier. Treat anything below verified as a lead, not a citation.
Measured performance
- Rmax
- 13.39 PFlop/s
- Rpeak
- 41.82 PFlop/s
- Rmax ÷ Rpeak
- 32.0%
- Cores
- 99,216
- Power
- -
- Per watt
- - GF/W
Figures are as last publicly reported for the configuration described below, not a live measurement. Where a system was upgraded in place, the post-upgrade configuration is shown and the earlier one appears in the timeline.
What this machine is made of
One row per supplier relationship. “Supplier at build” is the company that shipped the part at the time; where that company has since been acquired, the parent it rolls up to today is shown beside it. That distinction is what makes ticker-level aggregation possible across a thirty-year dataset.
| Role | Part | Supplier at build | Quantity | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrator | - HP DL385 cluster (TOP500) | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | - | Reported | top500.org |
| Accelerator | NVIDIA H100 SXM5 Accelerators CUDA (Hopper GH100) · 16,896C · 1.98 GHz · TSMC 4N · 700 W NVIDIA H100 (TOP500); MIT cites more than 600 NVIDIA GPUs without the model | NVIDIA | - | Reported | top500.orgnews.mit.edu |
| CPU | - AMD EPYC 9254 24C 3.9GHz | AMD | - | Reported | top500.org |
| Operating system | Ubuntu Server Operating systems Linux distribution · Open source, free with paid support tiers Ubuntu | Canonical | - | Reported | top500.org |
AI datacenter metrics
Figures beyond an accelerator count, each with who stated it. What can and cannot be compared across AI datacenters.
| Metric | Value | As of | Basis | Note | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerators | 600 accelerators | 2025-10 | Operator stated | MIT release says more than 600 NVIDIA GPU accelerators; 600 is a lower bound, not an exact count. | news.mit.edu |
The read
The MIT Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center's generative-AI system at its Holyoke, Massachusetts data centre, successor to TX-GAIA. MIT announced it on 2 October 2025 as the most powerful AI supercomputer at any US university, with more than 600 NVIDIA GPUs and a peak of two AI exaflops, and says it came online in summer 2025. TOP500 lists an HPE DL385 cluster with AMD EPYC 9254 24-core 3.9 GHz hosts, NVIDIA H100 accelerators and 100G Ethernet under Ubuntu: 99,216 cores, Rmax 13.39 PFlop/s, Rpeak 41.82 PFlop/s. The MIT article does not name the GPU model or node counts, so no accelerator quantity is recorded. TOP500 ranks: 114th (June 2025), 131st (November 2025), 150th (June 2026).
Timeline
Public list appearances
Pointers only: rank and edition, linking to the canonical entry. We do not reproduce list tables. See sourcing policy.
Site & facility
Change history
- 2026-10-02 Added TX-GAIN, MIT Lincoln Laboratory's H100 AI supercomputer
Source check
We fetched this system's own citations and recorded whether each page actually mentions it. This is a corroboration signal, not a fact check, and it is published so you can see how well the sourcing holds up rather than take it on trust.
| Cited source | Result | Found on the page |
|---|---|---|
| news.mit.edu | names system only | - |
| top500.org | names system and part | NVIDIA H100 SXM5, Ubuntu Server |
Checked 2026-10-09 by pnpm verify. Re-run it and the table changes with the web.
Further reading
Operating a supercomputer
Acceptance testing, why "installed" and "in production" are six months apart, and the machine lifecycle.
Inside a node
Latency-optimised versus throughput-optimised processors, NUMA, and the end of the host-to-device copy.
Programming a supercomputer
The software stack beneath the application, and why the OS is now a sovereignty signal as much as a technical choice.