COMPUTE ATLAS Supercomputer supply-chain graph
1153 systems 482 sites Sourced data

Supercomputers/Systems/JD Cloud 100,000-GPU Cluster

China · planned · ai training

JD Cloud 100,000-GPU Cluster

Operated by JD.com at JD Cloud (undisclosed site, China) .

Phase 1 seed dataset, compiled by hand. These rows were built from public operator, laboratory and vendor sources. A mechanical second-reader pass has since fetched every cited source: 1092 of 1153 systems have a readable citation that names them, and 40 are genuinely weakly sourced. Every claim carries its source and a confidence tier. Treat anything below verified as a lead, not a citation.

Measured performance

Rmax
-
Rpeak
-
Rmax ÷ Rpeak
-
Cores
-
Power
-
Per watt
- GF/W

Figures are as last publicly reported for the configuration described below, not a live measurement. Where a system was upgraded in place, the post-upgrade configuration is shown and the earlier one appears in the timeline.

What this machine is made of

One row per supplier relationship. “Supplier at build” is the company that shipped the part at the time; where that company has since been acquired, the parent it rolls up to today is shown beside it. That distinction is what makes ticker-level aggregation possible across a thirty-year dataset.

Role Part Supplier at build Quantity Confidence Source
Integrator -
JD Cloud, JD.com's cloud-computing division, is the operator and integrator of the cluster, built in partnership with Moore Threads
JD.com - Reported technode.com
Accelerator -
100,000 Moore Threads GPUs (trade press reports the part as the MTT S5000); predecessor JD Cloud/Moore Threads cluster used roughly 10,000 MTT S4000 GPUs
Moore Threads
100,000
reported
Reported technode.comglobaltimes.cn
Interconnect -
Moore Threads MTLink proprietary GPU-to-GPU interconnect fabric; trade press reports roughly 800 GB/s peer-to-peer bandwidth, not independently verified
Moore Threads
- Reported techtimes.com

AI datacenter metrics

Figures beyond an accelerator count, each with who stated it. What can and cannot be compared across AI datacenters.

MetricValueAs ofBasisNoteSource
Accelerators 100,000 accelerators 2026-09 Design target TechNode: JD Cloud announced 9 Sep 2026 a planned 100,000-GPU Moore Threads cluster; no MW or cost given. technode.com

The read

JD Cloud, the cloud-computing division of Chinese e-commerce group JD.com, announced plans at JD's Global Tech Explorers Conference on September 9, 2026 to build a 100,000-GPU cluster using domestically designed Moore Threads GPUs (trade press including tech news outlet coverage reports the part as the MTT S5000; a smaller predecessor JD Cloud/Moore Threads cluster of roughly 10,000 GPUs, reported as the earlier MTT S4000 part, was already operational per the same announcement). The cluster uses Moore Threads' proprietary MTLink GPU-to-GPU interconnect fabric and is intended to support large-model training and inference, embodied-AI/robotics workloads, and JD's own JoyAI foundation-model family, alongside a commercial GPU-hour cloud service JD Cloud sells to outside enterprises. JD Cloud and Moore Threads describe it as the first 100,000-GPU-class cluster built on domestically designed GPUs at a major Chinese cloud provider. Moore Threads has separately claimed 95 percent linear scaling efficiency and roughly 10 ExaFLOPS of aggregate performance for the cluster, but coverage of the announcement notes no independent organization has verified either figure against a controlled workload, so no Rmax/Rpeak figure is recorded here and the tier stays reported rather than verified. As of the September 2026 announcement the cluster had not yet been built, so status is recorded as planned with no first-operational date; the exact site within JD Cloud's China data center footprint (which spans Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai and Suqian) is undisclosed.

Timeline

Site & facility

JD Cloud (undisclosed site, China)

Location
China
Commissioned
2026

Change history

Source check

We fetched this system's own citations and recorded whether each page actually mentions it. This is a corroboration signal, not a fact check, and it is published so you can see how well the sourcing holds up rather than take it on trust.

Cited sourceResultFound on the page
technode.comblocked our fetch-
globaltimes.cnnames system only-

Checked 2026-10-09 by pnpm verify. Re-run it and the table changes with the web.

Further reading